What happens to some design thesis when the program is interpreted wrongly

Many students are not able to interpret properly the client’s brief into architectural program. In the lower years the brief is given by the lecturers and that was easier as all you do is follow the brief to achieve the objective.

How would you know if your brief is good enough and that the program eventually will be good enough.

The uncertainty or usually independently learning mode done earlier now makes the student rely on the input. If not, they get lost. They cannot judge for themselves. Previously they can judge for themselves. The building type was clear and so on.

This problem has been highlighted before, where it was suggested that we find the sites for the students.

Or we limit the area of study, such as we focus on education buildings i.e. kindergarten,schools, universities, academies (for example).

Students will then concentrate on the particular type of building and then come up with the architectural program after studying the precedents rigorously.

Or we clump area of studies : Education in one group; Recreation in another group; Markets in another group; and Housing in another group.

We may avoid master-planning, transportation building, hospitals and conservation (adaptive re-use is okay).

Then students will be given guidance with the expertise. We focus on a seminar-type program where the students do proper case studies and proper precedent studies, visiting specific buildings.

Special studies will then be focus as well depending on the building types.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s